|
|
Post by nanichris on Jan 16, 2013 10:24:26 GMT -5
People have been trying to get Obama thrown out of office since the first time he raised his hand and was sworn in. But if you want to see a unique and new way, go to www.jedipauli.com and it's associated sites. I don't know if it will go anywhere but the guy is trying. And that's what we all should be doing. Support those with ideas if you can't come up with anything yourself. |
|
|
|
Post by jerrycsmith on Jan 16, 2013 10:43:08 GMT -5
I'd make my usual suggestion, but not online.
|
|
|
|
Post by nanichris on Jan 16, 2013 10:47:01 GMT -5
What? Nuke 'em?? We all know you don't really mean that. But we must be careful because "big brother" is watching. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by jerrycsmith on Jan 16, 2013 15:23:44 GMT -5
Let me state for the record that I categorically deny having hard feelings or destructive thoughts regarding any government official or agency.
Further, I am not acquainted with anyone who does not genuinely approve of our government official or agencies, nor would I knowingly aid and abet said persons in any endeavor to express or act upon their destructive or libelous tendencies.
On an entirely unrelated subject, I have some fine seashore property and uranium mineral rights for sale in St Clair County.
|
|
|
|
Post by nanichris on Jan 16, 2013 17:49:30 GMT -5
;D I understand completely!
BTW, while I don't advocate violence or assassination of a president, I would not cry if it happened. But the down side is that he would be held up as a martyr in the eyes of the low information citizens. No, I'd MUCH rather see him put in jail for all of the illegal and unconstitutional things he's done. I'd like to see him have to repay the citizens of this country for all of the Hawaiian vacations he's taken. Those vacations should have been on his dollar, not ours. No, I remember how Nixon had to leave the W.H. in disgrace and cower in California for the rest of his life. I'd much rather see that happen than see Obama shot. I do feel sorry for his daughters though. Can you imagine having that awful person for a father? Yuck! I can't imagine how they will feel when they are adults and come across all of the evidence that their father was on the down low, and was a man who wished to destroy their country.
|
|
|
|
Post by jerrycsmith on Jan 16, 2013 19:00:26 GMT -5
Not to worry; he will be out of there in a little less than four years.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tommy Thompson on Jan 16, 2013 20:00:16 GMT -5
Not to worry; he will be out of there in a little less than four years. I hear the progressives are trying to find a way to change the 22nd amendment I believe it is so Obama can have a third term. I've even heard mention of Michelle Obama running in 2016. These thugs are getting scarier by the minute..LOL |
|
|
|
Post by jerrycsmith on Jan 16, 2013 20:46:25 GMT -5
That's nothing new; Lurleen did it for George Wallace way back when. Actually, it's no longer a candidate issue; the Democraps could run Chewbacca and win.
|
|
|
|
Post by nanichris on Jan 17, 2013 10:30:33 GMT -5
I am of the opinion that this country need 4 very active political parties. As it stands now if someone is disgusted with their representative in Congress they only have one other realistic choice. And if one doesn't happen to like the opposite party's candidate then it's back to the old guy. And those old guys and gals stay in the Congress far beyond the time that they should have been returned to private life. BUT, if we had 4 very active parties there would be two other choices. Not all Democrats are nut cases and want the far Left in power. And not all Republicans think that the party is able to represent their views effectively. So if we had more of a choice, I think it would help to throw out the people who just go to Washington and stay there on the public dime without really doing what the majority in their state want them to.
|
|
|
|
Post by jerrycsmith on Jan 17, 2013 10:37:38 GMT -5
More than two parties would only further divide the conservative Republican vote. The Democraps already have everything they want in one neat package.
|
|
|
|
Post by nanichris on Jan 17, 2013 12:36:09 GMT -5
That is certainly one point of view Jerry, but I don't believe it is true. I know a lot of Democrats who can't get themselves to convert to being an Independent or a Republican, who just don't like what is going on in their party. The primaries don't do the job because the incumbent has the BIG advantage. While splitting up the vote might seem to be the only result of more parties, I believe that it would be a good thing. There are ALWAYS going to be the low information voters, and the greedy. They will vote for the person who has the best 30 second ad on TV and will give them "pones". But there are many out there who would like to vote for the best candidate, not just the least evil one. And I believe that having more candidates would help. And yes, I know you are going to say that it would only bring in more crooks. Perhaps, but at least we could have more of a choice. ;D
This is one of the reasons that our Founding Fathers did NOT believe in political parties. They had had enough of them in Europe.
|
|
|
|
Post by jb on Jan 18, 2013 9:43:44 GMT -5
Yep, I think what is in DC now, will be there for the long haul!!  |
|
|
|
Post by nanichris on Jan 18, 2013 9:58:03 GMT -5
J.B. you may be right, OR the American citizens might just have had enough and start fighting back.
You know why the government is backing gun control so hard. They are afraid that all of the armed Americans might just start voting with their guns. I wonder how loyal all of those low
informed citizens would be to Obama if the bullets started flying?
Now Obama is revving up his campaign organization to get people to push congress to get behind what Obama wants. This is unethical as there are laws on the books that the W.H. can not use the people there, or campaign funds to do just that.
But then, Obama has never worried about laws or ethics, has he?
|
|
